Super Lawyers to name top law schools

 

 

One of the best indicators of the quality of a law school is the quality of lawyers it produces. Beginning next week, we’ll list on superlawyers.com the law schools that produce the most lawyers on each of our state lists, beginning with Florida. This state-by-state approach sets us apart from the U.S. News & World Report rankings which are compiled using a national survey. They “rank” the top 100 schools in the nation. But the rest of the schools are simply placed into two tiers and are not ranked within those tiers.

This is great for comparing a Harvard to a Yale, but what about all those state and regional law schools --  how do they stack up against each other? For many -- if not most -- law school applicants, the choice is not which law school in America to attend, but which law school in a particular state to attend. For these applicants, our state rankings will be particularly useful.  Our rankings will also shed more light on all those excellent state and regional schools that don’t receive much attention in the U.S. News & World Report rankings.

So stay tuned as we roll out our lists of top law schools by state.

Alaska Bar Approves Super Lawyers Advertising

Alaska is the latest state to approve the use of one’s Super Lawyers selection in advertising.

State bar association Ethics Opinion 2009-2, states in part:

 

Lawyers and law firms may refer to a listing in Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers, or another commercial professional ranking so long as the reference includes the publication name, date, and the practice area, if one was specified, in which the lawyer was ranked or selected.

Guess What -- You're the Brand

I’ve seen firms spend tens of thousands, perhaps more, on navel gazing exercises to determine exactly who they are and how they want to be perceived in the marketplace. One firm I know spent months on a logo redesign and then called a press conference to roll out the new look. Woopee!

I never understood this.

Except in rare instances, it seems to me that clients hire lawyers, not law firms. So shouldn’t marketing reflect that reality?

We’ve all seen the fancy websites and brochures that describe the firm in eloquent legal marketing blather – a full service law firm, committed to excellence, we understand the needs of our clients, for more than 70 years providing zealous representation, dedication, integrity, concern, blah, blah, blather. It’s all a waste of space and money as far as I’m concerned.

I’ve always believed that the only brand that really counts in legal marketing is the brand of the individual lawyer.  The law firm is nothing more than a collection of individuals that is constantly changing.

The smart marketing dollar is invested in the individual lawyer, not the ephemeral firm. 

Tags:

Carville on Communications: Lose the litany

I just got back from the LMA convention held this year in National Harbor, MD, just outside of DC. The featured speakers Thursday morning were the husband and wife team of  James Carville and Mary Matalin.  I jotted a few notes on what Carville said legal marketers and lawyers should keep in mind in their marketing communications:

According to Carville, the least effective and most overused form of persuasion is the litany of accomplishments. Forgo the litany, he advises, and instead, think in terms of sound bites.

“’Love thy neighbor as yourself.’ Now there’s a sound bite that worked” he says. “It sums up a whole religion.”

Not surprisingly, he also cited “It’s the economy, stupid,” as another example of a sound bite that worked, this simple phrase being the essence of an entire presidential campaign.

An effective marketing message needs to meet a four-prong test, he says: It must be relevant, simple, repetitive and exclusive. Exclusivity in this context means the message has to be your own – unique to you and your practice.

Lastly, to reinforce the message or sound bite, tell a great story that illustrates the point.

So once again, I’ll repeat his relevant, simple and exclusive sound bite: “Lose the litany.” And of course, don’t’ forget to “Love thy neighbor.”

New Jersey Super Lawyers is here

New Jersey Super Lawyers magazine is out. You can read stories online at superlawyers.com.

Here’s a preview:

The cover story features labor and employment lawyer Angelo Genova who went from coffeehouse beatnik to Mr. Connected in New Jersey law and politics.

Other profile subjects include:

  • Raymond Brown who represents Sudanese refugees and other international victims of atrocity in addition to chairing the white-collar crime practice group of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis;
  • Family lawyer Stephen Haller who represented former New Jersey governor Jim McGreevey in his divorce, helping him win shared custody of his daughter;
  • Owen McKeon who works with cigar companies to snuff out counterfeits;
  • Environmental litigator Steve Kunzman explains how writing a brief is similar to writing a song;
  • Geoffrey Rosamond who helps ex-convicts prepare for re-entry.

How to create print ads that work -- Lesson One: Your mug is beautiful

When you get a magazine in the mail, what’s the first thing you do?

If you’re like most people, you don’t immediately start to read the magazine. Instead, you probably flip through and look at the pages. And what’s the first thing on a page you look at? The photos.

Especially if the photos are of fellow human beings. And if we recognize someone, we slam on the brakes and dig into to find out why our next door neighbor, or college classmate, or fellow parishioner has her picture in a magazine. We can't help it. We're hardwired this way.

This simple, indelible truth is often overlooked by print advertisers. Too many print advertisers run cold, sterile “image ads” that have not a trace of humanity in them. No people, no photos, no story, no point of view.

In legal circles, large firms are notorious for creating people-less “image ads.” These ads are loaded with visual clichés associated with the law – Doric columns, courthouse steps, gavels, scales of justice, law books, or better yet, an open law book with a pair of reading glasses positioned just so upon the pages. But no actual lawyers.

Among more progressive large firms, a memo was apparently circulated at one time that if you want to shake up your ad, it’s okay to feature animals – lions, tigers, bears, and even elephants, are okay, but for  god’s sake, keep the damn lawyers out of the ad!

The result. The completely forgettable ad. The airball of advertising. I’ll bet these image ads produce nothing but a deafening silence for a response.

If you’re a small or mid-size law firm that doesn’t have a big marketing department, or ad agency on retainer, and you want to get your money’s worth for your print ad, put your picture in the ad.

Why? Because anyone who knows you – colleagues, judges, opposing counsel, clients, past clients, potential clients – will stop and notice the ad. At that point you’ve already achieved what scores of print ads fail to accomplish – NOTICE and RECALL, the golden words of advertising.

It doesn’t matter that you’re not buff or beautiful. Remember: as a lawyer, you are the product. You are the brand. You need to get out there. 

Your photo will reach out and grab the reader in way that words cannot. This is not a sophisticated concept. It’s not fancy. It’s not creative or award-winning. But it works!

In Super Lawyers, the impact of a photo goes a big step further: Notice and recall in the context of Super Lawyers equates to, “I noticed you were in Super Lawyers. You’re among the five percent they chose. That must mean you’re considered by others to be a pretty darn good lawyer.”

That’s a great message to get out there and it didn’t take a word of copy to communicate. In print advertising, the old saying is especially true: A picture – especially your picture -- is worth a thousand words.

Focus on That Which Does Not Change

The legal marketing world is all atwitter over online social networking (see for example, “Top Reasons For Using Twitter” by Larry Brauner, posted by the ubiquitous Larry Bodine on his LawMarketing Blog).

You better be Linkedin or you’ll be left out. Tweet or get beat. Why spend time taking clients to lunch when you can spend your noon hours blogging for dollars?

All this change is rather intimidating. Lawyers are busy enough practicing law and maintaining a semblance of family life. You got 73 emails in your in box and there’s a frantic client who’s already called you twice this morning.  Who has time for online chat?

How do you build a client development strategy around all this change?

You don’t.

At least that what Amazon.com’s Jeff Bezos says. The other night, on Charlie Rose, Bezos stressed that businesses need to focus on things that don’t change, i.e., the customer’s needs and wants. If you attempt to build strategy around things that change, he said, your strategy will keep shifting, and you won’t get anywhere.

A while back I consulted with a lawyer. I had one simple question pertaining to one sentence in a basic legal document. I had a five minute phone conversation with the lawyer that verified what I already knew. There were a couple of administrative email exchanges (acknowledging receipt of the document, promising to review and get back to me, etc.) which contained no legal analysis or other substantive work product. We never discussed rates or billing. A part of me thought she might not bill me at all for such a simple matter.

A month later I received a bill that took my breath away. A building contractor would not send this large of an invoice without first providing an estimate. An auto mechanic would not perform work for this much money without getting your permission.

To add insult to injury, there was no note or letter from the lawyer, just a bill with an obtuse and repetitive (not to mention questionable) block of text reciting the work performed, followed by a curt demand to pay the painful total.

Lawyers are expensive. I get it. But it wasn’t the cost so much as the treatment that bothered me – the presumptuous conceit that says you, Mr. Client, don’t need to understand what you’re buying. Just shut up and pay.

Like any other customer or client, I want to know up front what it is I’m buying, approximately what it will cost. I want to know that I was smart for hiring my lawyer. That it was a worthwhile expenditure and that I wasn’t taken advantage of. This is as true today as it was 50 years ago, and it will always be the case.

During the next year, how much focus, time and energy will we give to addressing the basic, immutable needs of our clients and customers? Or will we be too busy on Twitter?

When the Spirit Moves You

When you receive your copy of Super Lawyers magazine, you may be moved to tell us a few things. Perhaps you think we left someone deserving off the list; or maybe you think we included someone who shouldn’t be on the list. In the past, you had to wait several months before you could nominate that overlooked attorney, and other than sending us an email or letter, there wasn’t an effective means of providing us feedback regarding the lawyers on the list.

Now all that has changed.

We’ve expanded the nomination period so that it opens about the same time you receive Super Lawyers magazine. With the magazine in your hand and the spirit moving you, you can immediately log on to my.superlawyers.com to nominate and voice your opinion while things are still fresh in your mind.

And the nomination process is no longer about simply providing us with a name. We’ve added two new features to the nomination page: The “Comment” feature allows you to tell us exactly why you believe the attorneys you nominate should be included. You can comment privately, or allow publication of your comments, with or without attribution.

The “Rate” feature allows you to rate each attorney on 12 criteria, things like, knowledge of the law, ethics, results, civility, and so on. Both the Comment and Rate features are optional. You can still nominate by simply providing the name of the lawyer.

What if there’s a lawyer on the list you don’t think should be there? At the top center of every page on my.superlawyers.com there’s a tab you can’t miss: It’s labeled “Comment on/Evaluate Lawyers.” Click on this and you’ll be given the same “comment” and “rate” options as on the nomination page. As always, we will treat these comments and ratings as confidential unless you direct otherwise. 

Next time you receive Super Lawyers, we hope you’ll remember to take advantage of this opportunity to vent. In case you don’t, we’ll be running ads in the magazine reminding you to log on to my.superlawyers.com to comment, rate and nominate. Judging from the number of comments and ratings we’ve received so far, lawyers appreciate these new options. It all takes just a minute or two, and the feedback you provide is invaluable to us.

 

Jenny Durkan Recommended for U.S. Attorney

Jenny Durkan, perennial Washington Super Lawyers honoree and longtime counsel to Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire, may be the next U.S. attorney for the Western part of the state. In a Feb. 12 letter to the White House, Sens. Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell recommended Durkan for the top federal prosecutor position in Seattle.

According to her profile on superlawyers.com, Ms. Durkan successfully represented the Democrats at trial in the Washington State Governor's election contest. She formerly served as Governor Lowry's Executive Counsel, chaired the Attorney General's Consumer Privacy Task Force, and has co-chaired U.S. District Judge selection committees.

 

Grading Law Schools -- The Super Lawyers Approach

When people ask where I went to law school, I like to say I went to the Harvard of St. Paul, Minnesota. That would be William Mitchell College of Law.

Never heard of it? This tells me you're not from Minnesota. You see, Billy Mitchell (as we affectionately call it) is very well respected in this state. It's produced  a Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court (Warren Burger), scores of State Supreme Court justices and many of the top lawyers in Minnesota. While Billy Mitchell ain't Harvard, it's a darn good law school. 

But you'd never know that if you relied on the US News & World Report rankings of law schools from 2008. We Mitchell grads took a collective shot in the, um, midsection when our school was listed dead last in the survey. (Okay, it wasn't quite that bad -- the magazine didn't bother to "rank" the loser schools listed in the 4th tier, so they just listed them alphabetically).

Two other law schools from the Twin Cities, Hamline and the University of St. Thomas, were listed in the third tier, while the University of Minnesota was ranked 22nd nationally.

I swear this is not sour grapes on my part here, but US News completely missed the mark on Mitchell. Consider the 2008 Minnesota Super Lawyers list. Thirty-four percent of the lawyers on the list graduated from the University of Minnesota; 26 percent from William Mitchell; 9 percent from Hamline and zero from St. Thomas (which is not surprising, since the school opened in 1999). How can it be that a lowly 4th tier school produces more than a quarter of the state's top lawyers?

Perhaps Mitchell suffers because it doesn't have a football team. It's an independent law school, not affiliated with a major university or college. Who knows? But one thing seems clear: US News uses a national ranking process. As such, they seem to do a good job ranking "national" law schools, but when it comes to local and regional schools, the process might not work so well.

The majority of students entering law school will not attend a nationally ranked school. For these students there needs to be a more reliable indicator of how local and regional schools rank compared to one another. That's where Super Lawyers comes in.

A reliable indicator of the quality of a law school is the quality of the attorneys it produces. In coming issues, Super Lawyers will publish graduation statistics on the lawyers named to our statewide lists. We believe this will give students a more accurate picture of how local law schools compare to one another, and will give a fairer shake to the Harvards of places like St. Paul, Minnesota.